Do All States Require Background Checks For Gun Purchase

Background checks for individual sales of firearms in the United States

Proposals for universal groundwork checks would require virtually all firearms transactions in the U.s. to be recorded and go through the National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS), closing what is sometimes chosen the individual auction exemption. Universal background checks are not required by U.S. federal police, simply at least 22 states and the District of Columbia currently crave background checks for at least some private sales of firearms.

Background [edit]

Federal law requires groundwork checks (through the National Instant Criminal Background Check System) only for guns sold through licensed firearm dealers, which account for 78% of all gun sales in the Usa. This effigy was published in a 2017 study past the Annals of Internal Medicine which, using a 2015 survey, found that 22% of recent gun transfers (purchased and nonpurchased) were completed without a background check.^[ane] The authors noted that while this number was less than in years past, it nonetheless indicates that millions of American adults are able to obtain firearms without background checks.^[1] The electric current federal constabulary allows people not "engaged in the business" of selling firearms to sell firearms without a license or records. A 2008 report from the Coalition to Stop Gun Violence (CSGV) stated that the National Instant Criminal Background Check Arrangement had prevented over i.iv million felons and other prohibited persons from purchasing firearms in the years between 1994-2005.^[2] According to the CSGV, the law also has a prohibitive effect, that deters illegal purchases.

In November 1998, President Pecker Clinton directed the U.S. Secretary of the Treasury and the U.S. Chaser General (A.M.) to provide recommendations apropos the fact that 25 percent or more of sellers at gun shows are not required to run groundwork checks on potential buyers. This was called the gun show loophole.^[3] ^{: three, 12} ^[iv] ^[5] ^: 27 Two months later, Gun Shows: Brady Checks and Law-breaking Gun Traces was released.^[3] The Secretary and the A.G. made vii recommendations, including expanding the definition of "gun show," and reviewing the definition of "engaged in the business organization".

Afterwards the Columbine High School massacre in April 1999, gun shows and groundwork checks became a focus of national debate.^[6] ^[7] ^[8] In May, the executive vice president of the National Burglarize Association (NRA) told the Firm Judiciary Subcommittee on Crime, "We think it is reasonable to provide mandatory, instant criminal groundwork checks for every sale at every gun show."^[9] ^: 118 Those concerned about the shows believed they were a source of illegally trafficked firearms.^[x] ^{[nb 1]} Efforts to opposite a key feature of the Firearm Owners Protection Act (FOPA) by requiring criminal groundwork checks and buy records on private sales at gun shows, which had get prolific in the U.S. since the police force'south passage in 1986, were unsuccessful.^[11] ^[12]

Private sale exemption [edit]

In the Baronial 5, 2010, issue of The New England Journal of Medicine, researchers Garen J. Wintemute, Anthony A. Braga, and David M. Kennedy, wrote that gun shows account for only a fraction of all U.Due south. gun sales and that a more effective strategy would be to make all private-party gun sales go through the screening and record-keeping processes that FFL dealers are required to do.^[xiii] Their report concluded:

Drawbacks with respect to expense and inconvenience still, 83% of self-reported gun owners and 87% of the full general population endorsed regulation for all individual-political party gun sales in a 2008 poll that was conducted for the advocacy arrangement Mayors Confronting Illegal Guns. Gun owners gave stronger support to this all-inclusive approach than to a gun-show-simply proposal in a 2009 poll conducted for the aforementioned organization. Either proposal would face tough sledding on Capitol Hill. It would therefore seem preferable to move forward with the version that is nigh probable to reduce the rates of firearm-related violence.^[13]

Following the December fourteen, 2012 Sandy Hook Unproblematic School massacre, at that place were numerous calls for universal background checks^[14] ^[xv] ^[16] to close what is now referred to as the "individual sale loophole."^[17] ^[eighteen] ^[nineteen] In an essay published in 2013, Wintemute said that comprehensive groundwork checks that included private sales would consequence in a simple, off-white framework for retail firearms commerce.^[20] ^: 103 In February 2014, researchers at the Johns Hopkins Centre for Gun Policy and Research reported that afterwards the 2007 repeal in Missouri of a long-standing law that required all handgun buyers to pass a groundwork check there was a 23 percent increment in firearms homicides.^[21]

A 2012 report published in the periodical Injury Prevention found that about lxxx% of all firearms used for criminal purposes are obtained through transfers from unlicensed dealers, which are non required to conduct groundwork checks in a majority of states due to the private sale exemption.^[22]

In 2017, a study by researchers from Northeastern University and the Harvard School of Public Health showed that 22% of American gun owners who had obtained a gun in the previous ii years did not undergo a groundwork check before doing so.^[23]

Public stance [edit]

Universal groundwork checks savour high levels of public support; a 2016 representative survey plant 86% of registered voters in the United states supported the measure.^[24] Five national polls conducted in 2015 show high levels of support for "expanded groundwork checks for gun purchases," with rates varying (93% and 89% support in two Quinnipiac University surveys, 92% support in a CBS/New York Times survey, 86% support in a Gallup survey, 85% support in a Pew Enquiry Middle survey).^[25] A 2015 survey institute that more than 90% of Americans supported universal groundwork checks, and that, on average, Americans thought they would be more than effective than any other gun policy.^[26] At that place is testify that many Americans incorrectly remember that universal groundwork checks are required by federal law; a 2016 survey found that 41% of Americans believed this to be the example. The same survey plant that 77% of Americans supported universal groundwork checks, while only 53% supported stricter gun laws. Based on this data, the authors concluded that "this difference might be attributable to poor awareness of the limitations of existing laws."^[27]

In 2015, large majorities of American adults, both Republicans (79%) and Democrats (88%), supported groundwork checks for private sales and at gun shows, according to a Pew Research Middle survey.^[28] In 2017, potent majorities of American adults, both gun owners (77%) and non-gun owners (87%), supported background checks for private sales and at gun shows, co-ordinate to a Pew Research Center survey with an error owing to sampling of +/- ii.viii% at the 95% level of confidence.^[29] In 2018, later on the Stoneman Douglas High School shooting in Parkland, Florida, nearly all Americans supported universal background checks.^[30] ^[31] 88% of registered voters supported universal background checks, according to a Politico/Morning Consult poll with a margin of error +/- 2%.^[30] 94% of American voters supported universal groundwork checks, according to a Quinnipiac University Polling Institute poll with a margin of fault of +/- three.4%.^[31]

A July 2019 poll by NPR constitute that 89% of respondents supported background checks for all gun purchases at gun shows or other private sales.^[32] An overwhelming majority of Republicans (84%) and Democrats (96%) indicated their support, suggesting there is bipartisan popular consensus on the broad topic in the public.^[33]

Opposition [edit]

Gun rights groups such as the National Rifle Association and National Shooting Sports Foundation oppose universal groundwork cheque proposals.^[34] ^[35] Opponents of universal background checks contend that existing gun laws are sufficient; that the government does not prosecute enough of the attempted ineligible buyers who are turned away by the current system; that background checks are an invasion of privacy; and that "transfer" might be defined too broadly.^[36] Opponents as well maintain that universal background checks would not stop crime^[36] ^[37] and assert that the only style to properly enforce a universal organisation would be to require a registration database.^[37] Gun-rights abet and author John Lott argues that universal background checks forbid poorer Americans from acquiring guns. Lott said that, as of Dec 2015, background checks added an effective cost of $80 (New York), $60 (Washington state), or $200 (Washington, D.C.) to transferring a firearm. Lott argues that universal background checks are an effective tax on guns and can prevent less affluent Americans from purchasing them, and that this disproportionately affects poor minorities who live in high-crime urban areas.^[38]

Some local counties have adopted Second Amendment sanctuary resolutions in opposition to universal background check laws.^[39] ^[40]

Effectiveness [edit]

Studies [edit]

Universal background cheque laws were associated with a 14.nine% reduction in overall homicides, according to a 2019 report by medical researchers including Michael Siegel of the Boston Academy Schoolhouse of Public Health and David Hemenway of the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health published by the Journal of General Internal Medicine. The study authors wrote that "farther research is necessary to determine whether these associations are causal ones".^[41]

An October 2018 study conducted by the Violence Prevention Enquiry Programme (VPRP) at UC Davis and the Middle for Gun Policy and Research at Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health found no modify in firearm homicide or suicide rates in the x years following California's 1991 implementation of comprehensive background checks. The study's command group used firearm and non-firearm bloodshed data for 32 states that did not implement major firearm policies during the period from 1981-2000. In the study flow, firearm suicide rates were 10.ix percent lower in California simply a similar subtract in not-firearm suicide was also observed. The report found no net difference between firearm-related homicide rates before and during the written report period. The study authors identified a number of possible reasons for the null finding, including inadequate reporting of criminal records or other disqualifying information to groundwork-bank check databases (especially pre-2000); a failure past sellers to conduct the background check as required by constabulary; and the small-scale number of persons affected by the California law.^[42]

Some other study past the VPRP found that comprehensive background check policies led to increased groundwork checks in Delaware, but not in Colorado or Washington. Non-compliance with the policy may be attributable to the lack of an increase in the latter two states.^[43]

A study published in July 2018 found no association between firearm homicide and suicide rates and the repeal of comprehensive groundwork bank check laws in two states. The study compared rates from synthetic control groups to rates in Indiana from 1981 to 2008 and in Tennessee from 1994 to 2008. Rates from the 2 states' study periods were within the range of natural variability. The study also concluded that in order to understand whether comprehensive background checks generally reduce firearm deaths, more evidence from other states is needed.^[44]

A written report published in June 2018 in the Journal of Urban Health by authors affiliated with the Violence Prevention Inquiry Program (VPRP) at UC Davis and the Heart for Gun Policy and Enquiry at Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health found comprehensive background check (CBC) laws non tied to a permit-to-purchase law were associated with an increase in firearm homicide rates but not not-firearm homicide rates.^[45] The authors of the study noted, however, that they accept "identified no plausible theory to explicate how requiring a prospective firearm purchaser to undergo a background check would effect in increased homicide rates."^[45] In attempting to explain the unexpected results, the researchers proposed an endogenous human relationship such that states passing the CBC-only laws were doing and then in response to already rising firearm homicide rates.^[45]

A 2016 report published in The Lancet attempted to measure out the touch on that 25 different state laws had on overall firearm-related mortality, and it found that universal background checks had the strongest overall impact.^[46] Additionally, the researchers' project of a federally implemented universal background cheque policy predicted that national firearm bloodshed could driblet from 10.35 deaths per 100,000 people to 4.46 deaths per 100,000 people.^[46] A 2015 study published in the American Periodical of Public Health found that a Connecticut law (enacted in 1995) requiring handgun buyers to undergo a groundwork check (in order to obtain a required let) "was associated with a 40 percent decline in gun homicides and a xv percent driblet in suicides" during the law'southward first ten years in effect.^[47] A 2014 study published in the Journal of Urban Health institute that the 2007 repeal of a "permit-to-purchase" handgun constabulary in Missouri (including the repeal of a background-check requirement) was associated with a 23% increase in the firearm homicide charge per unit and a fifteen% increase in the murder rate, translating "to increases of betwixt 55 and 63 homicides per year in Missouri."^[48] The study controlled for other variables that might bear on homicides, including "changes in rates of unemployment, poverty, incarceration, break-in, law enforcement officers per capita, and the presence of 4 other types of state laws."^[48] A 2013 written report published in the JAMA Internal Medicine analyzed various types of firearm legislation across the U.South. from 2007-2010 and firearm-related deaths beyond all 50 states, and concluded that stronger background checks were associated with lower overall firearm fatality rates.^[49]

Scholarly surveys [edit]

In a survey published by the New York Times in Jan 2017, a panel of 32 scholars of criminology, public health, and constabulary rated universal background checks as the most constructive policy to prevent gun deaths, ranking information technology #1 of 29 possible gun-related policies (7.3 on a ten-bespeak effectiveness calibration).^[fifty] In a subsequent expert survey published in October 2017 on policies to adjourn mass shooting deaths specifically, the proficient panel ranked universal checks for gun buyers and universal checks for ammunition buyers as 6.6 and 6.v (on a ten-bespeak effectiveness scale), respectively, ranking them as the fifth- and sixth-most constructive of xx gun-policy proposals.^[51]

A survey by Arthur Berg, Gary Mauser, and John Lott, published in the winter 2019-2020 edition of the Cato Found quarterly Regulation, asked respondents (38 criminologists, 32 economists, and 50 public health researchers who had published an empirical study on firearms in a peer-reviewed periodical) to rank the effects of 33 firearms policies (20 policies in the New York Times in 2017, plus 8 additional policies that would loosen gun regulation, and 5 additional restrictive policies) on reducing murder rates and mass shootings. (Berg, Mauser, and Lott asked about "murder rates" rather than gun homicides because they made the assumption that stricter gun laws would not affect the homicide charge per unit.) Respondents ranked universal background checks 13th and 14th for reducing the murder charge per unit and reducing mass shootings, respectively. Public health researchers were essentially likelier than economists and criminologists to charge per unit universal background checks as constructive.^[52]

Implications for mental health counseling [edit]

Universal background check laws, which require that a background cheque be conducted earlier whatsoever gun transfer, may apply to temporary removals of guns from the home of suicidal individuals. Some clinicians have reported that these laws accept created confusion virtually whether a gun transfer would be legal, and therefore fabricated information technology more difficult for them to counsel their patients.^[53]

States with universal background bank check laws [edit]

As of July 2020, 22 states and District of Columbia require groundwork checks for at to the lowest degree some private sales of firearms, as follows:^[54]

Jurisdiction	Summary from Giffords Law Center^[54]
California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Nevada, New Bailiwick of jersey, New Mexico, New York, Oregon, Rhode Island, Virginia,^[55] Vermont, Washington, and the District of Columbia	"Require universal groundwork checks at the point of sale for all sales and transfers of all classes of firearms, whether they are purchased from a licensed dealer or an unlicensed seller."^[54]
Maryland and Pennsylvania	"Require point of sale groundwork checks for handguns but not for long guns, similar rifles and shotguns."^[54]
Hawaii, Illinois, and Massachusetts	"Require all firearm purchasers to obtain a allow, issued subsequently a groundwork check, in order to purchase any firearm" (this requirement is in lieu of a point-of-sale groundwork cheque)^[54]
New Bailiwick of jersey	"Requires firearm purchasers to both obtain a allow to purchase a firearm and, if the purchase is from an unlicensed seller, conduct the transaction through a federally-licensed firearms dealer."^[54]
Michigan, Nebraska, and North Carolina	"Permit and background check requirement for handgun purchases merely not long-gun purchases."^[54]

In Maine, a 2016 referendum to require groundwork checks on private sales failed later on a closely fought campaign, with "yeah" gaining 48.ii% of the vote and "no" gaining 52.8% of the vote.^[56] ^[57] In 2014, a referendum in Washington state to require groundwork checks on private sales (Initiative Measure out No. 594) passed,^[54] with "yes" gaining 59.3% of the vote and "no" gaining twoscore.vii% of the vote.^[58]

Notes [edit]

^ A written report released in 2009, 10 years after Columbine, discussed the role that gun shows play in trafficking to Mexico.^[5]

References [edit]

^ ^a ^b Matthew Miller, MD, ScD; Lisa Hepburn, PhD; Deborah Azrael, PhD. "Firearm Conquering Without Background Checks". Annals of Internal Medicine . Retrieved Feb 20, 2017. {{cite spider web}}: CS1 maint: uses authors parameter (link)
^ "America's Gun Shows: Open up Markets for Criminals" (PDF). Coalition to Stop Gun Violence & Educational Fund to Stop Gun Violence. 2008. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2008-11-27.
^ ^a ^b U.S. Department of the Treasury, U.S. Department of Justice (January 1999). "Gun Shows: Brady Checks and Crime Gun Traces" (PDF). atf.gov. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms (ATF). Retrieved June 27, 2014. {{cite web}}: CS1 maint: uses authors parameter (link)
^ "Gun Show undercover" (PDF). October 2009. p. eleven. Retrieved June 26, 2014.
^ ^a ^b "Firearms Trafficking: U.S. Efforts to Combat Arms Trafficking to Mexico Face Planning and Coordination Challenges" (PDF). gao.gov. Us Government Accountability Part (GAO). June 2009. GAO-09-709. Retrieved June 27, 2014.
^ "The debate on gun policies in U.Due south. and midwest newspapers". Berkeley Media Studies Group. Jan one, 2000.
^ National Conference of State Legislatures (June 1, 2000). "Colorado After Columbine The Gun Contend". The Gratuitous Library past Farlex. Gale Group.
^ "No Questions Asked: Groundwork Checks, Gun Shows, and Crime" (PDF). Americans for Gun Prophylactic Foundation. April one, 2001.
^ LaPierre, Wayne (May 27, 1999). "Statement of Wayne LaPierre, Executive Vice President, National Burglarize Clan at Pending Firearms Legislation and the Administration'due south Enforcement of Current Gun Laws: Hearing Earlier the Subcommittee on Law-breaking of the Committee of the Judiciary of the House of Representatives One Hundred 6th Congress Start Session". commdocs.house.gov. Washington, D.C. Retrieved July 4, 2014. No loopholes anywhere for anyone.
^ "Following the Gun: Enforcing Federal Laws Against Firearms Traffickers" (PDF). Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF). June 2000. Archived from the original (PDF) on March 31, 2003.
^ Olinger, David (Feb 13, 2000). "Dealers alive for gun shows". Denverpost.com . Retrieved January 29, 2015.
^ Baum, Dan (June 8, 2000). "What I saw at the gun show". rollingstone.com . Retrieved January xxx, 2015.
^ ^a ^b Wintemute, Garen J.; Braga, Anthony A.; Kennedy, David M. (August 5, 2010). "Private-Party Gun Sales, Regulation, and Public Safety". The New England Journal of Medicine. Massachusetts Medical Order. 363 (6): 508–511. doi:10.1056/NEJMp1006326. PMID 20592291. S2CID 40954102. Published online at nejm.org on June 30, 2010.
^ Hartfield, Elizabeth (December 24, 2012). "In Gun Control Debate, Arguments for Tougher Background Checks, Better State Reporting". ABC News Internet Ventures. Retrieved June 27, 2014.
^ Sullum, Jacob (January 11, 2013). "4 Questions About 'Universal Groundwork Checks' for Gun Purchases". Reason.com (Blog). Reason Foundation. Retrieved June 27, 2014.
^
More universal sources:
- Avlon, John (January 12, 2013). "Gun fence withal rages after Sandy Hook slaughter". The Telegraph. Telegraph Media Group. Retrieved June 27, 2014.
- Sullivan, Cheryl (January 12, 2013). "Gun debate 101: Time for 'universal' background checks on buyers?". Christian Science Monitor . Retrieved June 27, 2014.
- Martinez, Michael (January 28, 2013). "'Universal background cheque:' What does it hateful?". Cable News Network. Retrieved June 27, 2014.
^ Fisher, Kristin (December xv, 2011). "Illegal Internet Gun Sales are Soaring in Virginia". WUSA9. Archived from the original on February 8, 2015. Retrieved February 7, 2015. These Internet sales really are the new gun shows.
^ Shapiro, Eliza (Nov 29, 2012). "Gun-Control Lobby Targets Obama, Demands Reform". Daily Fauna.
^
More than private auction loophole sources:
- Kirkham, Chris (December 21, 2012). "Private Gun Sale Loophole Creates Invisible Firearms Market place, Prompts Calls For Reform". The Huffington Mail service.
- "Universal Background Checks & the Private Sale Loophole Policy Summary". Smart Gun Laws. Law Heart to Prevent Gun Violence. Baronial 21, 2013. Retrieved January 28, 2015.
- Taylor, Marisa (Dec 22, 2014). "Gun police loophole could have provided Brinsley's murder weapon, say experts". Al Jazeera America. Through something known as the private sale loophole, he could have purchased the firearm in the private market place at a gun show or out of someone's torso.
- Dobbs, Taylor (January 16, 2015). "Gun Rights Group Slams Proposed Legislation". Vermont Public Radio.
^ Wintemute, Garen J. (2013). "Comprehensive Groundwork Checks for Firearm Sales: Evidence from Gun Shows". In Webster, Daniel Due west.; Vernick, Jon S. (eds.). Reducing Gun Violence in America. JHU Printing. pp. 95–107. ISBN978-1-4214-1110-1. OCLC 823897002.
^ Webster, Daniel (February eighteen, 2014). "ID Bank check Repeal Prompts Spike In Murders, Written report Finds". All Things Considered (Interview). Interviewed by Audie Cornish. NPR. Retrieved June thirty, 2014.
^ Vittes, Katherine A.; Vernick, Jon S.; Webster, Daniel W. (2012). "Legal condition and source of offenders' firearms in states with the least stringent criteria for gun ownership". Injury Prevention. 19 (i): 26–31. doi:10.1136/injuryprev-2011-040290. ISSN 1475-5785. PMID 22729164.
^ Miller, M; Hepburn, Fifty; Azrael, D (3 January 2017). "Firearm Conquering Without Background Checks: Results of a National Survey". Annals of Internal Medicine. 166 (4): 233–239. doi:10.7326/M16-1590. PMID 28055050.
^ Bui, Quotrung; Sanger-Katz, Margot (January 10, 2017). "How to Prevent Gun Deaths? Where Experts and the Public Concord". The New York Times . Retrieved August 23, 2019.
^ Carroll, Lauren (5 January 2016). "Laura Ingraham wrongly says claim that 90% support for gun background checks has been debunked". Politifact . Retrieved seven Jan 2016.
^ Sorenson, Susan B. (October 2015). "Assessing views about gun violence reduction policy: A look at type of violence and expected effectiveness". Preventive Medicine. 79: fifty–54. doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2015.04.025. PMID 25952054.
^ Aronow, Peter M; Miller, Benjamin T (January 2016). "Policy misperceptions and back up for gun control legislation". The Lancet. 387 (10015): 223. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(xvi)00042-8. PMID 26842292.
^ Fingerhut, Hannah (January five, 2016). "5 facts nearly guns in the United States". Pew Research Center. Retrieved March 29, 2018.
^ Parker, Kim; Menasce Horowitz, Juliana; Igielnik, Ruth; Oliphant, Baxter; Brown, Anna (June 22, 2017). "America'southward Complex Human relationship With Guns". Pew Enquiry Eye. Retrieved March 24, 2018.
^ ^a ^b Shepard, Steven (February 28, 2018). "Gun control back up surges in polls". Politico. Retrieved March 19, 2018. Eighty-eight percent support requiring groundwork checks on all gun sales.
^ ^a ^b "Poll Release May 22, 2019". Quinnipiac University Polling Establish. May 22, 2019. Retrieved September 3, 2019. 94 Per centum Dorsum Universal Gun Background Checks
^ "Americans Largely Support Gun Restrictions To 'Do Something' Nigh Gun Violence". NPR.org . Retrieved 2020-12-09 .
^ "Poll: Americans Not Sold On Trump — Or Democrats". NPR.org . Retrieved 2020-12-09 .
^ Tom Hamburger & Josh Dawsey, "Trump tells NRA main that universal background checks are off the table", Washington Mail service (August xx, 2019).
^ Brendan J. Lyons & Dan Freedman, "Cuomo, eleven other Democratic governors urge tighter gun regulations", Olean Times Herald (September 10, 2019).
^ ^a ^b Skilful, Chris (April 10, 2013). "The Example Against Gun Groundwork Checks". ABC News Internet Ventures. Retrieved June 30, 2014.
^ ^a ^b Chiliad&A online editors (May 28, 2013). "NRA Members: Universal Background Checks 'Not a Solution'". Guns & Ammo. Intermedia Outdoors. Retrieved June 30, 2014. {{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: uses authors parameter (link)
^ Lott, John (2015-12-03). "Mass Shootings and Gun Control". National Review.
^ "Daily Bulletin: Students Prep the Adjacent Round of School Walkouts for Gun Reform". The Trace . Retrieved 2019-03-09 .
^ "New Mexico governor enacts expanded gun background checks". Las Cruces Sun-News . Retrieved 2019-03-09 .
^ Siegel, Michael; Pahn, Molly; Xuan, Ziming; Fleegler, Eric; Hemenway, David (March 28, 2019). "The Impact of State Firearm Laws on Homicide and Suicide Deaths in the United states of america, 1991–2016: a Panel Report". Journal of General Internal Medicine. 34 (10): 2021–2028. doi:10.1007/s11606-019-04922-x. PMC6816623. PMID 30924089.
^ Castillo-Carniglia, Alvaro; Kagawa, Rose M.C.; Cerdá, Magdalena; Crifasi, Cassandra; Vernick, Jon S; Webster, Daniel W; Wintemute, Garen J. (2019). "California's comprehensive groundwork check and misdemeanor violence prohibition policies and firearm mortality". Register of Epidemiology. thirty: fifty–56. doi:10.1016/j.annepidem.2018.ten.001. PMID 30744830.
^ Wintemute, Garen J.; Cerdá, Magdalena; Vernick, Jon S.; Webster, Daniel W.; Kagawa, Rose M. C.; Castillo-Carniglia, Alvaro (2018-12-01). "Comprehensive background check policy and firearm background checks in 3 US states". Injury Prevention. 24 (6): 431–436. doi:10.1136/injuryprev-2017-042475. ISSN 1353-8047. PMID 28986427.
^ Kagawa, Rose M.C.; Castillo-Carniglia, Alvaro; Vernick, Jon Southward.; Webster, Daniel Due west.; Crifasi, Cassandra; Rudolph, Kara E.; Cerdá, Magdalena; Shev, Aaron; Wintemute, Garen J. (2018). "Repeal of Comprehensive Groundwork Bank check Policies and Firearm Homicide and Suicide". Epidemiology. 29 (4): 494–502. doi:ten.1097/EDE.0000000000000838. PMID 29613872. S2CID 4594013.
^ ^a ^b ^c Crifasi, C.Chiliad., Merrill-Francis, M., McCourt, A. et al. "Association betwixt Firearm Laws and Homicide in Urban Counties." J Urban Health (2018) 95: 383. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-018-0273-3
^ ^a ^b Kalesan, Bindu; Mobily, Matthew East; Keiser, Olivia; Fagan, Jeffrey A; Galea, Sandro (2016-04-30). "Firearm legislation and firearm mortality in the USA: a cross-exclusive, state-level study". The Lancet. 387 (10030): 1847–1855. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(xv)01026-0. ISSN 0140-6736. PMID 26972843. S2CID 21415884.
^ Rudolph, Kara E.; Stuart, Elizabeth A.; Vernick, Jon S.; Webster, Daniel W. (2015). "Association Betwixt Connecticut's Permit-to-Purchase Handgun Law and Homicides". American Periodical of Public Wellness. 105 (8): e49–e54. doi:ten.2105/AJPH.2015.302703. PMC4504296. PMID 26066959.
^ ^a ^b Webster, Daniel; Kercher Crifasi, Cassandra; Vernick, Jon Due south. (2014). "Furnishings of the repeal of Missouri's handgun purchaser licensing law on homicides". Periodical of Urban Health. 91 (ii): 293–302. doi:x.1007/s11524-014-9865-8. PMC3978146. PMID 24604521.
^ Fleegler, Eric W.; Lee, Lois M.; Monuteaux, Michael C.; Hemenway, David; Mannix, Rebekah (2013-05-13). "Firearm Legislation and Firearm-Related Fatalities in the United States". JAMA Internal Medicine. 173 (nine): 732–xl. doi:ten.1001/jamainternmed.2013.1286. ISSN 2168-6106. PMID 23467753.
^ Quoctrung Bui & Margot Sanger-Katz (January 10, 2017). "How to Prevent Gun Deaths? Where Experts and the Public Concord". New York Times.
^ Margot Sanger-Katz & Quoctrung Bui. (Oct 5, 2017). "Experts poll on reducing mass shooting deaths". New York Times.
^ Lott, John R. and Berg, MD, Arthur and Mauser, Gary A., Expert Views on Gun Laws, Regulation (Winter 2019-2020).
^ McCourt, Advertising; Vernick, JS; Betz, ME; Brandspigel, S; Runyan, CW (1 January 2017). "Temporary Transfer of Firearms From the Home to Prevent Suicide: Legal Obstacles and Recommendations". JAMA Internal Medicine. 177 (ane): 96–101. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.5704. PMID 27842186.
^ ^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f ^g ^h Universal Background Checks, Giffords Law Center to Foreclose Gun Violence (accessed January i, 2020).
^ "Universal Background Checks". Giffords . Retrieved 2020-12-09 .
^ Kevin Miller, "Proposed expansion of gun background checks defeated", Portland Press Herald (November 8, 2016).
^ "November 8, 2016 Plebiscite Election: Official Results", Maine Department of the Secretary of State, Bureau of Corporations, Elections & Commissions.
^ "November 4, 2014 General Ballot Results: Initiative Measure No. 594: Concerns background checks for firearm sales and transfers", Washington Secretary of State.